Lacerta: The Lizard
There's a faint zigzag of stars wedged between two much better-known figures, and unless you already know it's there, you'll probably read right past it. Lacerta is easy to miss and mostly forgettable to look at — but it's got one resident that changed how astronomers talk about distant galaxies.
A lizard with no ancient pedigree
Johannes Hevelius put this constellation together in 1687, drawing it from faint stars scattered between Cygnus and Andromeda that nobody had bothered assigning to a figure. He called the resulting zigzag a lizard. That's the entire origin story — there's no classical myth here, no god or hero attached to it. Hevelius was doing the same kind of gap-filling that gave us Camelopardalis and Canes Venatici: working astronomer, blank patch of sky, a name that stuck.
If the pattern of "faint stars nobody claimed, so a 17th-century astronomer named it something" feels familiar, it should — a good chunk of the modern constellations share exactly this origin, and what is a constellation covers why the sky has both ancient figures and comparatively recent ones sitting side by side.
It's a little remarkable that a shape this dim survived at all, honestly. A zigzag of 4th-magnitude points is exactly the kind of thing that could have been quietly absorbed into a neighboring figure instead of getting its own name and its own boundary on every star chart that came after.
Three faint stars, none of them the star of the show
Alpha Lacertae, the brightest star in the Lizard, is a white main-sequence star at magnitude 3.77. 1 Lacertae, an orange giant, sits at magnitude 4.13. Beta Lacertae, a yellow giant, comes in at magnitude 4.43. None of these are going to stop you in your tracks. They're the quiet, ordinary stars that make up most of the sky once you get past the handful of famous names everyone already knows.
Ordinary is doing real work in that sentence, though. A white main-sequence star and an orange giant are two genuinely different kinds of object living out very different phases of a stellar life, sitting a few degrees apart in the same faint zigzag. You don't need a rare or famous star to see real variety — you just need to know what you're looking at.
The object that gave a whole category of galaxies its name
The real reason Lacerta matters is BL Lacertae — an object that looked, for a long time, like an ordinary variable star inside our own galaxy. It turned out to be something else entirely: the brilliant active core of a distant galaxy, a "blazar," where a supermassive black hole is pointed almost directly at Earth and blasting out radiation along our line of sight. Because BL Lacertae was the first one identified clearly enough to study, the entire class of similar objects across the universe is now named after it — blazars, or "BL Lac objects." A faint, forgettable-looking constellation turned out to host the namesake for a whole category of the most energetic things astronomers know about.
Lacerta also holds NGC 7243, a loose open star cluster, a much gentler and more conventional target for anyone with binoculars or a small scope. It's a nice palate cleanser after BL Lacertae — a plain, pleasant scatter of ordinary stars with nothing strange going on underneath it, which is most of what deep-sky observing actually is.
What this means for your own sky tonight
Lacerta is best placed for viewing in October from the northern hemisphere, tucked between Cygnus and Andromeda — locate either of those two well-known shapes first, and the faint zigzag between them is your target. This is a good constellation for practicing the difference between "a shape that pops immediately" and "a shape you have to build patiently, star by star." How star brightness works explains why a magnitude 3.77 star like Alpha Lacertae takes real dark-sky conditions to notice, let alone its dimmer companions.
Tonight, once you've found the zigzag, take a second to remember that one of those unremarkable-looking points isn't a star at all — it's an entire galaxy's core, seen end-on, bright enough from that distance to be mistaken for a nearby star for decades before anyone figured out what it actually was.